RMR683HGA Oregon, Nice idea, poor execution

Overall Rating2.332.332.332.332.33

Nice idea, poor execution

Pros:
- When it’s working, the MR683 is a nice little device. The base unit detects temp and humidity, but the included remote unit detects only temp. Nice touches are the atomic clock (nice to have when you consider the cons below…) The LCD shows a basic little temperature ‘trend’ arrow that is simple but surprisingly useful when trying to gauge whether or not to open up the windows at night vs leave the a/c on.

Cons:
- Button placement and utilization is horrible! Had to read the manual twice to figure out how to get the thing set up the way I wanted. 4 control buttons are flush-mounted on the side, and 6 are mounted on the back.

- Shows only one sensor at the time (have to find the button to switch between inside and outside temp.) Dure to the poor UI, you have to fumble with it a bit to make sure you hit the right button to swap sensors.

- After about 6 months, it stopped listening reliably to the external sensor. Swapped the batteries - didn’t help. Only thing that works is resetting the base unit. It does this about once a day, maybe when it’s syncing up with the atomic clock. I keep a paperclip handy to reset it.

- Time is lost when you reset the device (necessary due to the above con) and it takes a half a day for the clock to sync back up, so basically it’s now pretty useless as a clock most of the time…

Update (5/19/2012): This item is currently on sale here for the lowest price I’ve seen. I also found some auctions for this item here.

The featured review for this product, Oregon Scientific RMR683HGA Wireless Indoor/Outdoor Thermometer with Self-Setting Atomic Clock, White Kitchen, was written by Andrew Hoffman.

The average rating for this item is 2.3 out of 5 stars, according to 3 reviews.

Related posts:

  1. Sangean RCR-22 AM/FM, Top notch alarm clock -..
  2. Honeywell TE532ELW Long, weather forecaster review
  3. WS-2316 La Crosse, very good so far
  4. RMR383HGA-BK Oregon, Beware - Does not include..
  5. WS-9016TWC La Crosse, Great product

Reviews (3)

Andrew Hoffman

February 19th, 2010 at 11:02 am    


Overall Rating11111

Nice idea, poor execution
Rated 1 stars.


Ali Dimashkieh

March 8th, 2010 at 7:05 am    


Overall Rating44444

Well built and easy to use
The display is clearer than I thought, even from different angles. The only thing I didn’t like is that the provided sensor just reads temperature and not humidity. The humidity reading on the clock will stay as dashes. You have to buy a separate sensor for humidity.

Still this product is really good, and easy to adjust/install.


J. Doe

March 29th, 2010 at 10:11 pm    


Overall Rating22222

Disappointing and not recommended
I was disappointed by the Oregon Scientific product. I listed the reasons below. The outdoor sensor does not measure the humidity. Maybe the packaging said something to that effect, but it certainly was not obvious (I did not pack more to check). The plastic packaging has been very difficult to open. I had to use a pocket knife, and I came close to cutting myself. The instructions are poorly written. Yeah, I had the thing eventually, but only after cursing the people who wrote the instructions. One might think that the company would spend at least some effort to ensure that the instructions were clear and unambiguous. Directions say that the remote (outdoor) sensor is not working well in very cold weather and (because the batteries are not working well). Well, since I live in the north-east, very cold weather is common here. If I knew beforehand, I would not buy the device. I can not recommend this product. There must be something better available.


Leave a reply

Overall Rating

Name *

Mail *

Website